copyright 1996, Tracy-Williams Consulting
Figuring out where to go and how to get there is the main point of planning.
But doing so means creating some level of agreement on a common overall
vision and specific goals and objectives within the community.
Creating the ideas behind the vision and goals, the specific "reachable"
targets, and the consensus about their importance is best done through a
continuance of the public involvement processes described under Community
needs and concerns. Just as a community's needs must reflect the problems
of its residents, so must the vision and goals represent "marching
orders" acceptable to the majority.
Here are some of the areas in which a community's vision and goals may be
expressed. They are based, in part, on those identified in the National
Bicycling and Walking Study. Naturally, specific community visions and goals
may vary widely.
- Levels of bicycling: The community could commit itself
to increasing the amount of bicycling by a percentage, perhaps with varying
targets within certain use categories;
- Crash problems: Reducing the number, severity, and
frequency of serious bicycle crashes could form a very worthwhile part of
a community's bicycling vision.
- Existing transportation system: Setting goals for
making the existing transportation system more "bicycle-friendly"
would address current problems and encourage more riding.
- New transportation initiatives: Making sure that
all future transportation projects contain appropriate bicycle elements
can help ensure that future growth areas become "bicycle-friendly"
almost automatically. Setting specific funding targets would also help further
such a commitment.
Beyond the warm fuzzies
Turning vague statements about improving a community's "bicycle-friendliness"
into concrete steps often means defining terms and setting targets that,
in some ways may seem arbitrary. For example, if a community's bicycling
vision requires increasing bicycling by 10 percent, who's to say that 15
percent wouldn't be better?
The point of setting such targets, however, isn't whether they are 10 or
15, but, rather, that they are acceptable, identifiable, and achievable.
If, through a public process, the community agrees to increase the overall
number of miles bicycled by 10 percent by the year 2005, that is a clear
statement of intent. By setting such an explicit goal, the community can
then focus on the "how," that is, the objectives. Consider the
following example:
Sample Goal: To increase the percentage of commuters who
live within the community and who bicycle to work by 10% by the year 2005.
With such a target set, it's time to get serious about reaching it. Clearly,
a vaguely defined and randomly applied program is not the way to get there!
Here are a few examples of objectives that could help a community meet such
a goal:
- To require secure bicycle parking at all new work centers with 50
or more employees;
- To create a 1-day and a 1-hour bicycle commuter workshop and run it
for employees at 20 work sites per year;
- To offer tax incentives for existing work centers to install secure
bicycle parling to serve 10% of their employees;"
- To target employees living less than 2 miles from work for special
attention including special incentives, "bike buddy" match-ups,
and help in mapping routes.
Each of these objectives can (and should) be further refined to give more
specific direction. And, by carefully crafting such objectives, it becomes
easier to create clear measures of success. For instance, the objectives
imply the need for data on the numbers of commuters who travel certain distances,
the number who currently ride, etc. By gathering such data before starting
and periodically checking on any changes, it becomes possible to both measure
success and adjust one's efforts along the way to better reach the goal.
References:
- National Bicycling and Walking Study; FHWA, 1993
- Strategic Execution Plan; NHTSA, 1996
- Bicycle Safety Education: Facts and Issues; Ken Cross; AAA Foundation
for Traffic Safety, 1977
Topics for further study:
- The pros and cons of using Journey to Work data to measure local bicycling
- The Boulder, Colorado, long range transportation plan and its bicycle
measures
- Safety measures: what they tell and what they don't
- School bus programs and their impacts on bicycle use
- Washington State's Commute Trip Reduction law
- Oregon's Transportation Planning Rule
Return to Bike Planning and Program Development
Return to Planning and Design
Return to the BikePlan Source Home Page